Sunday, January 08, 2006

Produce

We are a product of our times. In today's modern times we spend so much of our time wanting more things, needed more money, bigger houses, more, more, more. What happened to the pursuit of intellect, or honor or justice, even? When were they lost?

When one reads about the great men and women of the past, they have one thing in common: most were voracious readers. The devoured knowledge, absorbed it. Look at the likes of Hamilton, Roosevelt, Churchill. These men were great intellects, as well as great leaders.

Are the great men and woman today of equal caliber? I'd say no. Those in power are not the type who have mastered these talents. They all are men of opportunity and staying power. The wait for their reward through years of loyalty, not talent. It's toadyism at it's worst.

The[1] difference between the times probably has everything to do with it. Intellectualism was of great importance. People read more wrote more, self-entertained more, discussed ideas in an open manner. Many of the great men since the Age of Enlightenment were great due to this extensive interest in knowledge.

Then again, are those of us who watch TV and enjoy the entertainments of this modern age merely the plebians, the groundlings, the unwashed masses of the day? What does that do for our significance in the world? There was certainly the fair share of people in the days of greats who were much less intellectually capable.

These were the sorts of people that the masters of the French or Russian revolutions grabbed onto, using the mob mentality to satisfy their own designs. For a more recent example, we can look at the post-9/11 America. Fear of terrorism on such a grand scale was used to railroad some very sketchy legislation through.

How do we combat this use of the mob? Education. Information. Not through the media, but through teachers, parents, and mentors. Given the way that TV seems to affect the brain, we really should start to try and remove it. Or perhaps change it. Due to the rise of Tivo, advertisement driven TV may be on the way out. It'll have to be more subtle, but perhaps that will allow some of the dumbing down of the populace to be removed.

This is more of a rant[2] than I usually go for, but I'm generally bothered by the course of government in the US these days. I think what bothers me more is the general apathy of the populace. We need to become more active in how our country is run, and the best way to do that is through education, information, and open dialogues.

Happily, it's a midterm election year. I think people are starting to get angry enough to enact some change.


[1] Funny how one can get stuck mid-sentence. Actually, this isn't really mid-sentence, is it? It's more of the first word. But it is a word that implies start to anything. The rest of the sentence needs to be formed in the mind before is placed to keyboard. Even in free-writing (and free-writing in my sense of the concept is simply writing about a topic and trying to stay on topic - which I'm obviously not doing) each sentence may only be thought of right after the completion of the last one. Anyway, back to that sentence...

[2] So as you can see, this is much less coherent than usual. Sometimes, you just gotta rant...

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Well my friend though I do agree that our age is particularly vapid and unintelligent I am not so sure that other ages weren't pretty much the same. You use Roosevelt, Hamilton, and Churchill as examples. Roosevelt was a brillent politician for a patrician family who saved American Capitalism. He ought to be more venerated than Reagen on the American Right. Hamilton was the fiery bastard son of a Carribean island who through much hard work and pure ego rose to power - his is a story more of intense strive of ego more than anything else. And Churchill was billient and corpulent; a man of two sides, possessing both extream intelligence and extream bone-headedness (ie his statements of machine gunning striking miners, anti-India Home Rule, and anti-women's voting rights).
What I am trying to say here Pete is that every successful politician (be it a king, cheifian, minister, or President) since the beginning of time has always been concious of mob control. All these past leaders were men of opportunity. Many of them were yes men like Hamilton who eventually rose to positions of power once the men they were saying yes to (such as Washington, in Hamilton's case) were dead or in retirement. Talent is important but how important really?

The times demand a certain sort of person and it gets it or it doesn't and a civilzaton falls. Look at Carthage. Hannible could have possibly won had the other optimates in Carthage been on his side but they weren't, they feared his power and never really gave wholly to Hannible... would want to see Emperor Hannible return from a conquered Italian pennisula. One can't blame some of these notables for their fear of the Barca family, yet it meant the destruction of Carthage within 60 years of the end of Hannible's campaign.